The thumb hovers. That little blinking cursor is a judgment in itself, a relentless digital heartbeat counting down the seconds until you either commit or retreat. The sentence sits there on the screen, a perfect little grenade of truth. It’s honest. It’s raw. It’s what you actually think.
And it is absolutely unspeakable.
We talk so much about vulnerability, championing it from conference stages and in pastel-colored infographics. We’re told to “bring our whole selves to work” and “share our truth.” But we never talk about the fine print: share the acceptable parts of your truth. Share the version of your vulnerability that makes a good story later, the kind that shows growth and resilience and can be wrapped up in a neat little bow. Don’t you dare show us the ugly, the petty, the weird, the contradictory, the thoughts that don’t have a moral at the end.
I was talking to a body language coach, Maria J.D., for a project a while back. She spent 29 minutes explaining the sheer cognitive load of social interaction.
I nodded along, of course. Intently. Because that’s what you do. I even remember thinking I should try to seem less agreeable, that my constant nodding might be undermining my authority. And there it was. Even in a conversation about the performance, I was performing.
This creates a profound and dangerous loneliness. It’s not the loneliness of being physically alone; it’s the loneliness of being surrounded by people and knowing you can’t show them 89 percent of what’s going on in your head. The weird intrusive thought, the stupid business idea, the dark fantasy, the petty grievance, the secret and shameful desire. These are the things that make us who we are, the raw material of our consciousness. And they have nowhere to go. They just circle endlessly in the skull, unexamined and unexpressed, fermenting.
Creativity is strangled in the process.
True creativity isn’t a brainstorming session with sticky notes. It’s born in the weird, uncomfortable, and often inappropriate corners of the mind. It’s the collision of two thoughts that shouldn’t be in the same room together. But when you’re constantly self-policing, you shut down those corridors. You stick to the safe, well-lit hallways of acceptable thought. You stop exploring because you’re terrified of what you might find, and even more terrified that someone else might see it.
I am part of the problem, and I know it. Years ago, a friend came to me with a truly bizarre and morally questionable thought about their family. My first instinct wasn’t to listen; it was to solve. To fix. I immediately started talking about therapy, reframing the thought, pathologizing it. I wanted to clean it up. I saw the look on his face-a shutter coming down. He’d brought me a piece of raw, messy clay, and I’d immediately tried to force it into a sensible pot. He wanted a witness, and I gave him a life coach. He never brought me anything like that again. I failed the test. I proved that my “judgment-free zone” had a very clear and active security system. It was a mistake that cost me a level of intimacy I have spent years trying to earn back.
This constant performance, this endless self-editing, it doesn’t just make us lonely and uncreative. It makes us stupid. It prevents self-awareness. You can’t understand your own motivations if you’re not willing to look at the ugly source code. You can’t grow if you spend all your energy curating a fictional version of yourself for public consumption. You end up believing your own PR, and that’s the real trap. You become the smiling emoji.